Waste management regulations


The human resources of the Governor of California Commission are insufficient when it comes to waste management.

Indeed, it falls, for example, to 10 people to control the implementation of all environmental law and manage procedures offenses. It is not a question of questioning their competence but of underline the lack of personnel in this area and whose task at hand is tedious. In California, the absence of staff is also crucial and it makes lack of consistent application of laws and regulations in the environment.

The persons responsible for inspecting classified installations … can visit at facilities subject to their supervision at any time ”. However, the waste management commission suffered from a lack of staff. Therefore, visits to facilities that aim to ensure the monitoring of the establishment and performance of equipment, with a view to reducing nuisances, remained insufficient. It was asked on several occasions to recruit staff. But these requests did not bear fruit because no response to their request was been obtained. To deal with the most urgent, in the control of discharges from classified installations, the state had to make operators accountable so that they become autonomous by monitoring their rejection themselves.

Indeed, the manufacturer has mission to transmit, in due form, a report to the governor, including indicating the nature and quantity of the discharges, their composition, etc. But, the establishments subject to self-monitoring are the establishments whose impact on the environment is reduced. They are subject to a simple declaration procedure which therefore establishes control of discharges by the manufacturer himself.

At the present time, therefore, we can say that there is a considerable number of legal texts which govern the matter and which can also constitute the basis of waste law. In fact, in California, waste management is a element of environmental law. Also, the waste sector has experienced important legal developments.

Californian waste law

Since the adoption of the first action program of California on the environment, we have entered a phase of a common environmental policy. Since then, more than 200 texts and frameworks on the environment were adopted as well as 5 action programs. In addition, the commission, always with a view to protecting environment, formulates new decisive proposals in the fields
following: air, water, waste, hazardous substances and major risks, nature and noise.

Within the state, the quantity of waste produced was estimated at 52.2 billion tonnes. This report also highlights a shortage disposal facility, hence the establishment of more and more landfills many and the export of waste. This increasing increase and not negligible is not without causing many problems because it risks including creating dangers for the environment.

Also, for the sake of protection, the Community had to deploy a strategy to waste management. Thus, the regulations relating to waste are subject to specific federal articles. This curative device is based on the following actions:
– Prevention of the production of waste and its harmfulness;
– Waste recovery;
– Waste disposal.

Indeed, the state of California sent a communication to the governor and the Parliament, in which it sets out its strategy for waste management. This communication which does not include nuclear waste, therefore sets prevention as the first objective waste, both through the development of clean technologies and through the establishment of an eco-labeling system.

The second objective is the recovery of waste therefore reuse, recycling, regeneration, recovery of raw materials or transformation into energy (combustion). The third objective is to optimize the final disposal of waste and this is where operations like Los Angeles dumpster rental companies come into play.

The other objectives concern the regulation of the transport of waste and remedial actions targeting abandoned landfills. Regarding management waste, the state declares that the provisions must be introduced, ensuring that waste is, as far as possible, eliminated in the centers closest to high density populations, using the most appropriate technologies guaranteeing a high level of the environment and public health.

The future will show if this principle is feasible. This waste disposal strategist chosen by the state in the context of waste management received approval by the governor office.